In the ever-evolving world of talent acquisition and management, organizations often face the pivotal question: Should they promote from within or cast their nets externally when filling key roles? It's a decision that carries significant implications for both the bottom line and the company culture. In this blog post, we'll dive into the nuances of internal promotion versus external hiring, exploring the costs, benefits, and real-world implications of each approach.

The Success Story of Internal Promotions

Let's start by shining a spotlight on the tried-and-tested practice of promoting from within. Research consistently shows that internal promotions tend to yield higher success rates compared to bringing in external candidates. Why? Because when you elevate someone from within your organization, you're tapping into a known quantity. These employees are already steeped in your company culture, well-versed in your processes, and aligned with your values. As a result, they often hit the ground running, requiring minimal ramp-up time and quickly adding value to their new roles.

The Hidden Costs of External Hires

While external hiring can bring fresh perspectives and new skill sets to the table, it's not without its drawbacks. One of the most significant downsides is the cost. Recruiting externally can be an expensive endeavour, with costs ranging from job postings and recruitment agency fees to travel expenses for candidates. And that's just the beginning. Once you've onboarded an external hire, there's often a steep learning curve as they familiarize themselves with your organization's unique dynamics. This can lead to productivity dips and additional training expenses, further driving up the overall cost of external hires.

Statistics on Promoting Internally vs. Hiring Externally:

Success Rate of Internal Promotions: Research indicates that internal promotions tend to result in higher success rates compared to external hires.According to a study by Wharton School professor Matthew Bid well, external hires take longer to adapt to their new roles and are more likely to be terminated or leave voluntarily within the first few years compared to internal promotions.

• Cost of External Hiring Mistakes: External hires can be costly if they don't work out. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) estimates that the cost of a bad hire can be as much as 50-60% of the employee's annual salary, considering expenses related to recruitment, onboarding, training, and lost productivity.
• Impact on Employee Morale: Constantly hiring externally without offering advancement opportunities to existing employees can negatively impact morale and engagement. Employees may feel undervalued and may be more likely to seek opportunities elsewhere, leading to higher turnover rates.
• Retention Rates: Promoting internally can contribute to higher employee retention rates. According to research by LinkedIn, employees who are promoted internally are less likely to leave the organization compared to those hired externally.
• Skill Development and Knowledge Transfer: Internal promotions facilitate skill development and knowledge transfer within the organization.Employees who are promoted internally already have a deep understanding of the company culture, processes, and values, which can contribute to faster integration and productivity.

Sample Costs Associated with Internal Promotions and External Hiring:

Recruiting

• Internal Promotions: The costs associated with promoting internally may include minimal recruitment expenses, such as advertising the job internally or conducting internal interviews.
• External Hires: External hiring typically involves higher recruitment costs, including job postings, external advertising, recruitment agency fees, and travel expenses for candidates.

Training and Onboarding:

• Internal Promotions: While internal promotions may require some training and onboarding, the costs are generally lower compared to external hires, as promoted employees are already familiar with the organization's systems, processes, and culture.
• External Hires: External hires often require more extensive training and onboarding to familiarize them with the company's culture, policies, and procedures, leading to higher training costs.

Productivity Loss:

• Internal Promotions: Since promoted employees are already familiar with their roles and the organization, productivity loss tends to be minimal.
• External Hires: External hires may take longer to ramp up and become fully productive, leading to potential productivity losses during the onboarding period.

Salary and Compensation:

• Internal Promotions: Promoted employees may expect a salary increase commensurate with their new roles, but the increase is typically lower compared to hiring external candidates for similar positions.
• External Hires: External candidates may command higher starting salaries or additional perks to attract them to the organization, leading to potentially higher compensation costs.

Turnover Costs:

• Internal Promotions: Promoting internally can contribute to higher employee retention rates, reducing turnover costs associated with recruitment, training, and lost productivity.
• External Hires: If external hires don't work out and leave the organization prematurely, turnover costs can be significant, including recruitment expenses for replacing the hire and potential lost productivity during the transition period.

The Retention Ripple Effect

Beyond the financial implications, there's another critical factor to consider: employee retention. Promoting from within sends a powerful message to your workforce—that loyalty and hard work are valued and rewarded. In contrast, an over reliance on external hiring can breed discontent among existing employees, who may feel overlooked or undervalued. This, in turn, can lead to higher turnover rates and the associated costs of recruiting and training replacements.

Finding the Right Balance

Of course, there's no one-size-fits-all solution. The key is to strike the right balance between internal promotion and external hiring, leveraging the strengths of each approach to meet your organization's unique needs. For roles requiring specialized skills or fresh perspectives, external hiring may be the way to go. But for positions where cultural fit and institutional knowledge are paramount, promoting from within often proves to be the wiser—and more cost-effective—choice.

‍